UPDATE - Councillors vote to seek injunction to prevent harassment by Rutland Anti-Corruption Group

Profile image for nora_hs

By nora_hs | Friday, January 11, 2013, 02:20

Rutland County Council has today issued an updated statement following last nights special meeting of the Full Council to decide what action to take regarding harrassment and accusations levied by the Rutland Anti-Corruption Group:-

"Councillors at Rutland County Council have taken the decision to seek an injunction to "prevent harassment of the Chief Executive and other officers by the Rutland Anti-Corruption Group and its members."

"The option of taking legal action for defamation is not being pursued at this time.

"The special meeting of Full Council (10 January 2013) also voted 23 (for) – 0 (against) – 3 (abstained) to support the Chief Executive or council officers who wish to bring legal action for harassment against members of the Rutland Anti-Corruption Group. (NB The three councillors who abstained were Richard Gale, David Richardson and Nick Wainwright who were present at the meeting.)

"The decision by Councillors was taken against the backdrop of a detailed legal report, produced by local government law specialists Bevan Brittan, requested by Members at the October meeting of Full Council.

"The report said the actions of the Anti-Corruption Group are damaging the ability of the council to recruit outstanding officers, hampering efforts to secure external funding for education and recreation, and distracting senior officers from doing their job. Read more.

"The report included a number of examples of email correspondence from Councillors Gale, Richardson and Wainwright which led legal experts to conclude that "the nature and extent" of emails sent to the Chief Executive "are very likely to amount to harassment".

"The report also featured examples of email correspondence from the group which [falsely] claim the council is manipulating land deals, flouting financial rules and regulations, as well as trying to manipulate the award of contracts."

"Speaking after the meeting, Council Leader Roger Begy commented "We have a Chief Executive and staff team who are simply doing their jobs to the very best of their ability. Of course they should be subject to scrutiny and challenge as that is the basis of local democracy. However, they should not have to put up with false allegations about their conduct and regular questioning of their integrity and honesty.  As Councillors we have to protect our staff, and this decision sends out a strong message."

"Councillor Begy added: "We totally support open and transparent debate and argument in meetings that are held in public so everyone is aware of issues and all are able to answer and account."

"The full decision of 10 January Special Council was as follows:

  • Authorise the authority to take legal action to seek an injunction to prevent harassment of the Chief Executive and other officers by the Anti-Corruption Group and its members; 
  • Resolve to grant an indemnity to, and support the Chief Executive and/or other officers, to take legal action in her/their own name(s) for harassment by the Anti-Corruption Group and its members; 
  • Resolve that all communications to any part of the Council from the Anti-Corruption Group and its members be subject to a Single Point of Contact, subject to periodic report back from the Chief Executive.  Also, that members of the Rutland Anti-Corruption Group use the secure GCSX council email system.
  • Authorise sufficient council funds be made available for these purposes
"A number of options that were available were not agreed at the meeting, but deferred to be potentially considered at some point in the future.  These included taking action in respect of defamation, asking the Chief Executive to make a complaint to the police, and carrying out a wider review into the impact of the group."

Tweet this article
      

Comments

       
  • Profile image for Jim Harrison Photographer

    is that why you do it then Ignatius. No I don't want to know who you are, that is your right to stay incognito. What is drivel to you is not always drivel to others and vice versa. If I find what is printed interesting to me then I will read it, if not-I won't. SIMPLES

    By Jim Harrison Photographer at 17:17 on 14/01/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for Ignatius

    I have to say that it's obvious some people in this town have to use aliases a lot because it's the only way they can trick people into reading their drivel.

    By Ignatius at 16:06 on 14/01/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for Jim Harrison Photographer

    I don't care who it is, I'm not bothered if you have an alias or not, that is your right. You are allowed to make a comment under whatever name you want to write it under, just so long as it is legal.
    As I stated earlier, if you feel you have a valid point- share it, if I don't think it is a valid point I will ignore it. SIMPLES

    By Jim Harrison Photographer at 11:22 on 14/01/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for NWainwright

    Hi Nick Wainwright here.

    By NWainwright at 20:31 on 12/01/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for GenevaNick

    There we go Viperone. Open and transparent. Jim, if you are not sure it's me tell what I need to do to prove it to you.

    By GenevaNick at 20:15 on 12/01/13

      Report
              
     
max 4000 characters
        
   

Latest Stories in Oakham

       
      

Local Vouchers

       
   

Search for...

       
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min rent is bigger than Max rent